A Good Example For Tuning Pre-Echo Detection Criterion
Make sure you have lame3.04 or greater. there were some bugs in the syncing of mp3x (the frame analyzer.)
Find a sample with a noticeable artifact. testsignal2.wv is a good example (see tests.php) LAME will produce obvious and artificial "snare" like sounds that should not be there. FhG sounds pretty good. If the FhG encoder has the same problem, then good luck getting GPSYCHO to sound better than FhG!
Figure out what frame causes the problem. I use mpg123 for this. For example, to play just 25 frames: "mpg123 -n 25 testsignal2.mp3". By trying different values for -n, you can usually get a pretty good estimate of which frames are bad.
For testsignal2.wav, the first problem is around frame 25.
Look at the frames with mp3x ('lame -g', the graphical frame analyzer). To get the frames from different encoders perfectly in sync with each other, you need to compensate for the various delays introduced by the encoder.
Encoders have different amounts of built in delay, meaning the mp3 file will add extra padding to the pcm data when it is decoded. All known decoders (including mpglib/mpg123 used by mp3x) also introduce their own delay, usually an additional 528 samples. So for the total amount of padding between the input file and a decoded output file, add 528 to the numbers below.
ISO models & MPECKER: 528 samples LAME 3.11 and earlier: 528 samples LAME 3.12-3.50 1160 samples LAME 3.54 and newer 48 samples, adjustable - see ENCDELAY in encoder.h FhG mp3enc31: 1160 samples
To use mp3x to do a direct frame by frame comparison between the various encoders, you need to add padding to the input file so that the encoded frames will be perfectly in sync. To add 632 bytes of padding to your input file, create a file "pad632.pcm" which just contains 4*632 bytes, all zero. Then:
sox file.wav -t raw -x -w -s -c 2 -r 44100 temp.pcm cat pad632.pcm temp.pcm > temp2.pcm sox -t raw -x -w -s -c 2 -r 44100 temp2.pcm file632.wav l3enc -if file632.wav -of file632.mp3 lame -g file632.mp3
(note: the following frame numbers refered to LAME 3.11, and FhG applied to the .wav file with 520 bytes of padding)
For testsignal2.wav, you can see frame 25 (granule 1) and frame 26 (granule 0), LAME does not use short blocks and FhG does. For these frames, the pe=1200. Forcing LAME to switch to short blocks for these (and other similar frames) by setting switch_pe=1000 will produce a mp3 file almost as good as the FhG.
So why not just change pe_switch to 1000? It might be a good idea, but then LAME will use about 2x as many short blocks as FhG. For example, in else3.wv, frame 29 (granule=1), the pe=1500, but FhG does not switch to short blocks. To compute the total number of short blocks in a MP3, run mp3x out to the last frame and then click on the "Stats" pull down menu.It will show a bunch of statistics from the MP3 file.
Note: the technique described above was used to tune some new window switching algorithms now in LAME 3.10. These new tunings solve all the problems mentioned above!